Difference between revisions of "Sovereignty of an Individual"
(→References) |
(→"Sovereignty of the Individual" is not an Emergent Property of Enlightenment Ideals [1]) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
==== Applications ==== | ==== Applications ==== | ||
<hr> | <hr> | ||
| − | ===== "Sovereignty of the Individual" is not an Emergent Property of Enlightenment Ideals | + | ===== "Sovereignty of the Individual" is not an Emergent Property of Enlightenment Ideals ===== |
| − | “To think about it (the sovereignty of the individual) as an emergent property of enlightenment ideals is dangerous, because that’s 400 years. Who cares about 400 years. This is forever and forever is a lot more firm grounding than 400 years. It (the sovereignty of the individual) is not a set of rational ideas. It is way way deeper than that.” | + | “To think about it (the sovereignty of the individual) as an emergent property of enlightenment ideals is dangerous, because that’s 400 years. Who cares about 400 years. This is forever and forever is a lot more firm grounding than 400 years. It (the sovereignty of the individual) is not a set of rational ideas. It is way way deeper than that.”<sup>[1]</sup> |
| | ||
| + | |||
==== Interpretations ==== | ==== Interpretations ==== | ||
<hr> | <hr> | ||
Revision as of 05:46, 29 March 2020
Contents
Definition
Applications
"Sovereignty of the Individual" is not an Emergent Property of Enlightenment Ideals
“To think about it (the sovereignty of the individual) as an emergent property of enlightenment ideals is dangerous, because that’s 400 years. Who cares about 400 years. This is forever and forever is a lot more firm grounding than 400 years. It (the sovereignty of the individual) is not a set of rational ideas. It is way way deeper than that.”[1]
Interpretations
See Also
References
[1] 2017 Maps of Meaning 08: Neuropsychology of Symbolic Representation (a quote from the last 4 minutes of the lecture)
